JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m (oops! fixed an issue) |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m (linked other template properly) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dude, that loco weed is totally for medicinal purposes. I, like, have a doctor's note, or something. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:09, 8 January 2007 (CST) | Dude, that loco weed is totally for medicinal purposes. I, like, have a doctor's note, or something. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:09, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:Yeah, right. ''For medicinal purposes.'' So, ''doc'', should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST) | :Yeah, right. ''For medicinal purposes.'' So, ''doc'', should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::If we were going to do this... we need also | ::If we were going to do this... we need also [[:Template: Drugs (TOS)]] to keep everything "clean". [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:::Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST) | :::Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::::I was thinking about that as I made this one, but wasn't sure if there were enough articles to warrant it. If consensus says yes, I'll go for it. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 13:32, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ::::I was thinking about that as I made this one, but wasn't sure if there were enough articles to warrant it. If consensus says yes, I'll go for it. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 13:32, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 19:59, 8 January 2007
Loco weed classification
Dude, that loco weed is totally for medicinal purposes. I, like, have a doctor's note, or something. --Steelviper 13:09, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, right. For medicinal purposes. So, doc, should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --Spencerian 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- If we were going to do this... we need also Template: Drugs (TOS) to keep everything "clean". Shane (T - C - E) 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --Spencerian 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- I was thinking about that as I made this one, but wasn't sure if there were enough articles to warrant it. If consensus says yes, I'll go for it. JubalHarshaw 13:32, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- We could probably lose the "Medical" and "Recreational" split for TOS and just list them all together. JubalHarshaw 13:52, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Created! JubalHarshaw 13:57, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --Spencerian 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- If we were going to do this... we need also Template: Drugs (TOS) to keep everything "clean". Shane (T - C - E) 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST)
TOS drugs
So what are we talking about for TOS drugs? Isoldin is the only medicinal one I can think of off the top of my head. Recreational is more extensive. Fumarello, Ambrosa, Ale, Plant Vapors (no article). That's all I've got. --Steelviper 13:37, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Forgot about "Homemade Buzzer". --Steelviper 13:39, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Grog was listed in the Alcohol disambig ... also linked your examples for quick perusal. JubalHarshaw 13:52, 8 January 2007 (CST)