Talk:Resurrection Ship, Part II/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Resurrection Ship, Part II/Archive 1
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:[[:Image:TheEnemysGateIsDown.jpg|We've]] [[:Image:TheEnemysGateIsDown2.jpg|seen]] [[:Image:TheEnemysGateIsDown3.jpg|them]], but thanks for the thought. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:40, 7 January 2006 (EST) | :[[:Image:TheEnemysGateIsDown.jpg|We've]] [[:Image:TheEnemysGateIsDown2.jpg|seen]] [[:Image:TheEnemysGateIsDown3.jpg|them]], but thanks for the thought. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:40, 7 January 2006 (EST) | ||
==Noteworthy Dialogue== | |||
What's up with the long dialogue sections? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself. | |||
Revision as of 02:13, 17 January 2006
Spoiler Pics
I have found a few spoiler pics for the upcomming episode. (You have been warned) Pic 1, Pic 2, Pic 3, Pic 4, Pic 5, Pic 6, Pic 7 --Blacklight
- We've seen them, but thanks for the thought. --Peter Farago 03:40, 7 January 2006 (EST)
Noteworthy Dialogue
What's up with the long dialogue sections? It's supposed to be noteworthy dialogue, not an entire transcript of the episode. I think whoever posts those (And i'm starting to believe its one person doing it) needs to keep it to a minimum, at least keep it to the point where it isn't longer then the article for the episode itself.