Template talk:Sourcebox: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Template:Sourcebox
(→‎Sources: clarification of authorship)
(→‎Sources: reply to SV)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Sources ==
== Sources ==
Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on [[Naturalistic science fiction]] that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)
Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on [[Naturalistic science fiction]] that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)
: This template is in action on [[Mercury class battlestar]]. I was toying with the ideas of creating a podcast namespace as well, which I may implement later on. :-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 15:05, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 20:05, 12 April 2006

Sources

Are there existing sources already within the wiki that we should capture into the source namespace? I was wondering if Podcasts qualified, and we also have that essay written by RDM on Naturalistic science fiction that Spence posted inline with the article that could get a source namespace and transcluded (instead of being in the article area). --Steelviper 14:55, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

This template is in action on Mercury class battlestar. I was toying with the ideas of creating a podcast namespace as well, which I may implement later on. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 15:05, 12 April 2006 (CDT)