Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques/Archive4: Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:


::: Thanks for your kind answers, Mr. Thompson. Needless to say I'm already counting down to December 1. -- [[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 19:16, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
::: Thanks for your kind answers, Mr. Thompson. Needless to say I'm already counting down to December 1. -- [[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 19:16, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
== [[Exodus!]] v. [[Exodus, Part I]] ==
Is there going to be any simularities between the ''Marvel comic'' and these episode's? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 19:22, 2 August 2006 (CDT)
:I would doubt it, Shane, because afaik the Exodus comic was an adaptation of ''Saga of a Star World''. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 06:43, 3 August 2006 (CDT)
::Yeah. I realized it a little late, but hey, it could happen. :) --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 09:07, 3 August 2006 (CDT)
== "[[Sacrifice]]" question ==
One of our contributors, [[User:Fordsierra4x4]], has recently captured [[:Image:Seshalaptop2 216 1080i.jpg|a screengrab]] of [[Sesha Abinell]]'s laptop from "[[Sacrifice]]". On it there is an interesting note about "Cylon impregnation and reproduction" -- a fact that the civilians should not know about, as far as the viewer knows. Is this just a gaffe or is this an indicator of a major security leak on the [[Big G]], or even a leak from Laura Roslin's office? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:20, 15 August 2006 (CDT)
:Those crackpots probably had a bunch of other wild theories, creating something of a "shotgun effect" whereby they actually end up being right on a handful of them (despite being wrong about a lot of others). Though I'd have to admit they were hitting pretty accurately on their other "MO" items... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:41, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
::Maybe the Black Market had a hand in it. After all, information is just as valuable as a physical item... --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 08:13, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
::I do not think there was a leak, nor that they had any black market help.  Most of the things on that list were things Sesha and other civilians already knew about; sleep deprivation (33), assault on natural resources (Hand of God), human models and multiple copies (Litmus), etc.  The only one on that list which wasn't publicly known was Cylon biological reproduction efforts, but she managed to grab a photo of the pregnant Caprica-Sharon on Galactica, so that's how she knew that.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 08:56, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
==Webisodes in Crisis?!==
[http://www.backstage.com/bso/news_reviews/multimedia/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003019506 According to this report], the Writer's Guild of America ordered BSG to refuse to release [[Battlestar Galactica: The Resistance|the Battlestar Galactica webisode series you wrote]] to NBC Universal for distribution, on the grounds that '''you aren't actually paid for doing it'''. 
*Is this report true?
::This gets into a murky area.  When TPTB originally asked for webisodes, there was no pay involved.  The whole staff politely refused to write any.  At some point, TPTB came up with a compensation package that didn't specify per se dollars for webisodes, but gave us a little raise for "additional duties."  There were no provisions for recompense for reuse of the original program content, or subsequent for-profit use.  We were bummed about that formula but excited about the storytelling possibilities.
::We checked out the payment formula with the WGA, who at that time did not have a specific policy regarding webisodes, and told us we could do as we liked.  We took the deal.  Subsequent research by the WGA has determined that webisode writing of the type we did is not sanctioned by guild contract (though I understand NBCUni holds otherwise).
::So, technically, we aren't "paid for doing webisodes," but we were compensated for work above and beyond our current producing duties.  I assume attorneys for both sides will be going over this for a while, trying to define it. - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
*Is this in fact the real reason that the Webisode series did not start airing 2 weeks ago, 10 weeks before the Season 3 premiere (one a week, every Friday) as originally planned?
::My recollection is that we were told the webisodes were going to do exactly that, which is why we wrote the story you'll eventually see.  But later in talking with people from the channel, we discovered that was not their intention -- at least at the time we spoke, which was at Comic-Con. - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
*What are your thoughts on the subject, as this directly affects you more so than like Toni or Carla, because you personally penned these things?
::Please clarify this question.  - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
:::Is the entire writing team given a raise for "additional work", or just you personally?--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 11:19, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
::::David and I are an official WGA writing team and we were given the bump for this "additional work."  To my knowledge, this did not affect any of the other writers on the show (The SHOW team), especially Carla Robinson and Toni Graphia, who left us for greener pastures.  (I'm reliably informed that the SciFi site is out of date on this staffing change.) - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 13:41, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
:::::*Gasp* The Scifi website out of date!? Never! (<-- sarcasm) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:30, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
*What are the current plans for the Webisode series (30 minutes of footage) should negotiations with NBC Uni completely break down?
::NBCUni took possession of the material and cuts as they are as of 5pm today.  They own them and they'll do with them as they see fit.  - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
*Will the Webisodes be deemed completely non-canonical as a result?  Are they destined to be a "lost (half) episode"?
::I don't know who determines "Canon."  The story will hold up and the consequences are played in the season opener - at least in the cuts that were delivered today.  - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
*What should we do with those scabs at "Eureka", who currently ''are'' broadcasting webisodes on Scifi.com; should we loyal fans 'bust some heads? (Without your prior knowledge...)
::I have no idea what deal was struck with Eureka - that may have all gone down before this.  It's just become time for the Guilds - DGA, SAG, and WGA to define these things, because digital download is the future of this industry.  It's time to work out a formula that works for everybody.  Meanwhile, I'm seldom an advocate for busting heads. - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
:::Seldom an advocate?  "Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what is right".  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 11:21, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
*Will they be destined for DVD?  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 14:32, 18 August 2006 (CDT)
::Unknown at this time.  - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
:Follow-up question:  was Lucy Lawless in the Webisodes series as Number Three? (As its during the Cylon occupation I think she might be there):  the Lucy fans might want to know....--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 14:34, 18 August 2006 (CDT)
::The wonderfully talented Ms Lawless, unfortunately, is not physically depicted in the Webisodes, although her spirit can be felt in the ominous Cylon presence - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
==Squadron numbers==
How many Vipers are in a "squadron" in the terminology used by the Colonial Fleet?  I ask because in "[[Scar]]" Roslin said they were getting enough metal ore to build "two squadrons" of Vipers.  Is a squadron 10? 12? 20?  If a squadron is 20, this would be a dramatic increase. 
While I'm on the subject, we've ''speculated'' that based on this dialogue, [[Mercury class battlestar]]s have some sort of limited Viper production facilities but the exact nature of such facilities eludes us.--->Another problem has come up regarding information from ''Battlestar Galactica Magazine'':  it's information isn't always quite accurate and when I asked Ron (via Mrs.Ron) on the messageboards, he said they aren't directly affiliated with the magazine in any way, so I don't know how this fits--> in issue #3, they say: 
:"A Battlestar's air wing generally consists of six to eight squadrons (20 ships each)...20 Vipers also form a reserve unit to replace lost or damaged ships on an ad hoc basis.  Each squadron is also supported by a single Raptor" (P.59)
Is this magazine information accurate?  Are there 20 Vipers to a squadron?  How many Vipers is Galactica capable of carrying (that is, during its prime when it was a new ship in the Cylon War, how many Vipers is it meant to support?):  How many can a Mercury-class Battlestar like ''Pegasus'' hold?  --->Based on these magazine numbers, there should only have been 6-8 at most Raptors on Galactica (during it's prime, so by the time of the Cylon attack probably less): In "[[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I]]" we see 20 Raptors jump to Caprica; Pegasus probably had an equal number of Raptors on board, but where did so many Raptors come from?  Can Pegasus construct Raptors just like Vipers?  Or (my explanation), are there just many refugee Raptors which escaped to Ragnar, because they've got their own FTL drives?  I mean Boomer escaped all the way from Caprica to Ragnar, and Crashdown was stated as being a refugee from another ship, so presumably a few other Raptors made it out (well, that's our assumption.  I still think its entirely plausible and not a stretch that there were 20 though).  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 20:53, 14 June 2006 (CDT)
:In the [[Miniseries]], a total of ninteen [[Vipers]] are shown on screen (at approx. 47 minutes, 25 seconds in), supported by a single [[Raptor]] ([[Boomer]] and [[Helo]]). It's safe to assume that the 20th ship was merely off-screen. --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 15:20, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
::You don't understand, the number on parade for the Miniseries decomissioning isn't clearly reflecting "a squadron", more specifically referring to just how many were built in "Scar" if "two squadrons" were built.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 22:46, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
:::True, but Adama does refer to them as "our squadron", that's the basis I was going on. --[[User:Madbrood|Madbrood]] 10:49, 16 July 2006 (CDT)
==Pegasus (Extended Version)==
The upcoming DVD release of "[[Pegasus (episode)|Pegasus]]" in the Season 2.5 DVD will be the re-edited, 5-Act Extended Version of ''Pegasus''.  Should we consider all of the scenes in this extended edition as non-canonical as the deleted scenes from other episodes?  Many Lord of the Rings fans consider the "Extended Edition" longer DVD versions to be the "definative" version, not the theatrical release, which got me thinking on this.  Case in point, there's reportedly a scene where Admiral Cain explains the technical differences between a [[Mercury class battlestar]] and a [[Galactica type battlestar]]:  is this information not going to be "valid"?  Much of the Deleted Scenes information we've examined previously has existed in a bizarre state of limbo on BattlestarWiki (but it's a system that works) in which we say "this is from a deleted scene and probably not canonical, but as it is not contradicted by anything (yet) its the current version" (i.e. Ellen Tigh said she'd been married to Saul Tigh for 7 years in a ''deleted'' scene, so we don't consider that ''strictly'' canonical. ——Of course the problem is, as Ron has explained in the podcasts, most BSG episodes run long (into the 50 minute range often) and many scenes are simply deleted for time (i.e. the problems that ensued when Apollo/Dualla relationship buildup scenes were cut, usually just for time, from other episodes)--->However, the difference in the Extended Version of  (soon to be Hugo Award winning) "Pegasus" is that Ron has openly stated that almost ''all'' of this removed material was taken out simply for ''time'' issues, not ''story'' issues.  How should we approach this material?  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 15:03, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
:::The issue of "canon" or "non-canon" is one I can seldom speak to -- but I can say that the writers room usually operates as if scenes shot all happened, whether they made the cut or not, unless later developments make better dramatic use of the characters if those scenes didn't occur.  There are some scenes that we either redid or deleted because the material wasn't working, but I don't think those have been released -- and those would definitely be "non-canon."  In the case of Pegasus, we always assumed the long version happened and we wrote as if you all had seen it, too. - [[User:Ngarenn|Ngarenn]] 13:12, 31 August 2006 (CDT)   
::There is rumor that Ron Moore is even doing a ''separate'', new podcast for the Extended Version of ''Pegasus'', co-hosted with David Eick.  Is this just wild rumor?--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 16:23, 26 July 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:01, 7 September 2006

Archive
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page. Please add new archives to Archive 05.


Luciana Carro: Casting; pronunciation of her name; Kat in "Final Cut"

First of all, I want to thank you for having made such vital contributions to my favorite show and for interacting with the crazy webfandom. As a proud member of the Luciana Carro Fan Board I am particularly glad that you and Mr. Weddle created the wonderful character of Kat. Now, finally on to my questions. Did you participate in any way in the casting of Ms. Carro? How detailed was your description of the physical appearance of Kat? And would you please be kind enough to solve the mystery of how to pronounce the name of Luciana Carro? Is it like lu-CHE-nna kerro?

We call her Loo-Chee-Ahn-Nah. She was cast in Canada by the folks who do these things. - Ngarenn 15:56, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Yeah Pedda Luciana is one of those Vancouver locals that they cast in BSG (as opposed to trucking out lots of American actors they hired local talent): You're in Germany Pedda so I don't know how much American tv you've seen but lots of BSG secondary cast members reappear in several other tv shows made in Vancouver, like Tahmoh Penikett (Helo), Aaron Douglas (Tyrol), Nicki Clyne (Cally), and Carro. She's been in stuff like "The L Word" and "Da Vinci's Inquest" (practically every secondary cast member on the show has appeared on "Da Vinci's Inquest" at some point). --The Merovingian (C - E) 16:50, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Thanks for your additions. Well, I was aware of the fact that BSG is filmed in Vancouver and that the vast majority of cast and crew are Canadian. Actually, with the notable exception of the German version of Ugly Betty, I'm only watching North American TV shows. (And dubbed US and Canadian TV shows occupy half the prime time of many Germans networks.) So yeah, I've seen many supporting actors on "Dark Angel", for example. Since I like browsing the IMDb I've also noticed that certain Vancouver-based series, most notably "Da Vinci's Inquest", "Godiva's" and "L Word", seem to be a career stop for virtually every Canadian actor. Okay, what I was originally interested in is how the relationship between the writing staff and the casting department was like, if there was any. In fact, this leads me to a related question: Which parts of the production are located in Vancouver and which aren't? Is Mr. Eick supervising the daily work in Vancouver, while Mr. Moore and the writing staff sit in L.A.? -- Pedda 19:16, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
According to Ron's wife Terry on the messageboards, they live in California but maintain an appartment in Vancouver, as Ron and family make trips there for several weeks at a time when he needs to periodically oversee stuff there. --The Merovingian (C - E) 19:47, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Unfortunately, her name wasn't mentioned in the Scar podcast. --Pedda 13:39, 15 August 2006 (CDT)

Since I (hopefully) have your attention: In "Final Cut" Kat says: "Hey, is that on? Are you recording? Hi, mom! Miss you, mommy. Hey, this is for my buddies on freighter 212. Yeah! That's for you!" Can we infer from this that Louanne's mother is among the fugitives? Or was it more like a joke? Hopefully Ms. Katraine is indeed alive, because I would love to see a relationship between a mother and her grown-up child. Since Kat is greeting her buddies on freighter 212: Was she aboard this freighter (instead of Galactica) before being selected as a nugget or even before the Holocaust?--Pedda 04:52, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
You will learn much more about Kat in "The Passage." - Ngarenn 15:56, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
Thanks for your kind answers, Mr. Thompson. Needless to say I'm already counting down to December 1. -- Pedda 19:16, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Exodus! v. Exodus, Part I

Is there going to be any simularities between the Marvel comic and these episode's? --Shane (T - C - E) 19:22, 2 August 2006 (CDT)

I would doubt it, Shane, because afaik the Exodus comic was an adaptation of Saga of a Star World. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 06:43, 3 August 2006 (CDT)
Yeah. I realized it a little late, but hey, it could happen. :) --Shane (T - C - E) 09:07, 3 August 2006 (CDT)

"Sacrifice" question

One of our contributors, User:Fordsierra4x4, has recently captured a screengrab of Sesha Abinell's laptop from "Sacrifice". On it there is an interesting note about "Cylon impregnation and reproduction" -- a fact that the civilians should not know about, as far as the viewer knows. Is this just a gaffe or is this an indicator of a major security leak on the Big G, or even a leak from Laura Roslin's office? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:20, 15 August 2006 (CDT)

Those crackpots probably had a bunch of other wild theories, creating something of a "shotgun effect" whereby they actually end up being right on a handful of them (despite being wrong about a lot of others). Though I'd have to admit they were hitting pretty accurately on their other "MO" items... --Steelviper 07:41, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
Maybe the Black Market had a hand in it. After all, information is just as valuable as a physical item... --Fordsierra4x4 08:13, 16 August 2006 (CDT)
I do not think there was a leak, nor that they had any black market help. Most of the things on that list were things Sesha and other civilians already knew about; sleep deprivation (33), assault on natural resources (Hand of God), human models and multiple copies (Litmus), etc. The only one on that list which wasn't publicly known was Cylon biological reproduction efforts, but she managed to grab a photo of the pregnant Caprica-Sharon on Galactica, so that's how she knew that. --The Merovingian (C - E) 08:56, 16 August 2006 (CDT)

Webisodes in Crisis?!

According to this report, the Writer's Guild of America ordered BSG to refuse to release the Battlestar Galactica webisode series you wrote to NBC Universal for distribution, on the grounds that you aren't actually paid for doing it.

  • Is this report true?
This gets into a murky area. When TPTB originally asked for webisodes, there was no pay involved. The whole staff politely refused to write any. At some point, TPTB came up with a compensation package that didn't specify per se dollars for webisodes, but gave us a little raise for "additional duties." There were no provisions for recompense for reuse of the original program content, or subsequent for-profit use. We were bummed about that formula but excited about the storytelling possibilities.
We checked out the payment formula with the WGA, who at that time did not have a specific policy regarding webisodes, and told us we could do as we liked. We took the deal. Subsequent research by the WGA has determined that webisode writing of the type we did is not sanctioned by guild contract (though I understand NBCUni holds otherwise).
So, technically, we aren't "paid for doing webisodes," but we were compensated for work above and beyond our current producing duties. I assume attorneys for both sides will be going over this for a while, trying to define it. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
  • Is this in fact the real reason that the Webisode series did not start airing 2 weeks ago, 10 weeks before the Season 3 premiere (one a week, every Friday) as originally planned?
My recollection is that we were told the webisodes were going to do exactly that, which is why we wrote the story you'll eventually see. But later in talking with people from the channel, we discovered that was not their intention -- at least at the time we spoke, which was at Comic-Con. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
  • What are your thoughts on the subject, as this directly affects you more so than like Toni or Carla, because you personally penned these things?
Please clarify this question. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
Is the entire writing team given a raise for "additional work", or just you personally?--The Merovingian (C - E) 11:19, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
David and I are an official WGA writing team and we were given the bump for this "additional work." To my knowledge, this did not affect any of the other writers on the show (The SHOW team), especially Carla Robinson and Toni Graphia, who left us for greener pastures. (I'm reliably informed that the SciFi site is out of date on this staffing change.) - Ngarenn 13:41, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
  • Gasp* The Scifi website out of date!? Never! (<-- sarcasm) --Steelviper 14:30, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
  • What are the current plans for the Webisode series (30 minutes of footage) should negotiations with NBC Uni completely break down?
NBCUni took possession of the material and cuts as they are as of 5pm today. They own them and they'll do with them as they see fit. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
  • Will the Webisodes be deemed completely non-canonical as a result? Are they destined to be a "lost (half) episode"?
I don't know who determines "Canon." The story will hold up and the consequences are played in the season opener - at least in the cuts that were delivered today. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
  • What should we do with those scabs at "Eureka", who currently are broadcasting webisodes on Scifi.com; should we loyal fans 'bust some heads? (Without your prior knowledge...)
I have no idea what deal was struck with Eureka - that may have all gone down before this. It's just become time for the Guilds - DGA, SAG, and WGA to define these things, because digital download is the future of this industry. It's time to work out a formula that works for everybody. Meanwhile, I'm seldom an advocate for busting heads. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
Seldom an advocate? "Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what is right". --The Merovingian (C - E) 11:21, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
Unknown at this time. - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
Follow-up question: was Lucy Lawless in the Webisodes series as Number Three? (As its during the Cylon occupation I think she might be there): the Lucy fans might want to know....--The Merovingian (C - E) 14:34, 18 August 2006 (CDT)
The wonderfully talented Ms Lawless, unfortunately, is not physically depicted in the Webisodes, although her spirit can be felt in the ominous Cylon presence - Ngarenn 22:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)

Squadron numbers

How many Vipers are in a "squadron" in the terminology used by the Colonial Fleet? I ask because in "Scar" Roslin said they were getting enough metal ore to build "two squadrons" of Vipers. Is a squadron 10? 12? 20? If a squadron is 20, this would be a dramatic increase.

While I'm on the subject, we've speculated that based on this dialogue, Mercury class battlestars have some sort of limited Viper production facilities but the exact nature of such facilities eludes us.--->Another problem has come up regarding information from Battlestar Galactica Magazine: it's information isn't always quite accurate and when I asked Ron (via Mrs.Ron) on the messageboards, he said they aren't directly affiliated with the magazine in any way, so I don't know how this fits--> in issue #3, they say:

"A Battlestar's air wing generally consists of six to eight squadrons (20 ships each)...20 Vipers also form a reserve unit to replace lost or damaged ships on an ad hoc basis. Each squadron is also supported by a single Raptor" (P.59)

Is this magazine information accurate? Are there 20 Vipers to a squadron? How many Vipers is Galactica capable of carrying (that is, during its prime when it was a new ship in the Cylon War, how many Vipers is it meant to support?): How many can a Mercury-class Battlestar like Pegasus hold? --->Based on these magazine numbers, there should only have been 6-8 at most Raptors on Galactica (during it's prime, so by the time of the Cylon attack probably less): In "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I" we see 20 Raptors jump to Caprica; Pegasus probably had an equal number of Raptors on board, but where did so many Raptors come from? Can Pegasus construct Raptors just like Vipers? Or (my explanation), are there just many refugee Raptors which escaped to Ragnar, because they've got their own FTL drives? I mean Boomer escaped all the way from Caprica to Ragnar, and Crashdown was stated as being a refugee from another ship, so presumably a few other Raptors made it out (well, that's our assumption. I still think its entirely plausible and not a stretch that there were 20 though). --The Merovingian (C - E) 20:53, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

In the Miniseries, a total of ninteen Vipers are shown on screen (at approx. 47 minutes, 25 seconds in), supported by a single Raptor (Boomer and Helo). It's safe to assume that the 20th ship was merely off-screen. --Madbrood 15:20, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
You don't understand, the number on parade for the Miniseries decomissioning isn't clearly reflecting "a squadron", more specifically referring to just how many were built in "Scar" if "two squadrons" were built. --The Merovingian (C - E) 22:46, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
True, but Adama does refer to them as "our squadron", that's the basis I was going on. --Madbrood 10:49, 16 July 2006 (CDT)

Pegasus (Extended Version)

The upcoming DVD release of "Pegasus" in the Season 2.5 DVD will be the re-edited, 5-Act Extended Version of Pegasus. Should we consider all of the scenes in this extended edition as non-canonical as the deleted scenes from other episodes? Many Lord of the Rings fans consider the "Extended Edition" longer DVD versions to be the "definative" version, not the theatrical release, which got me thinking on this. Case in point, there's reportedly a scene where Admiral Cain explains the technical differences between a Mercury class battlestar and a Galactica type battlestar: is this information not going to be "valid"? Much of the Deleted Scenes information we've examined previously has existed in a bizarre state of limbo on BattlestarWiki (but it's a system that works) in which we say "this is from a deleted scene and probably not canonical, but as it is not contradicted by anything (yet) its the current version" (i.e. Ellen Tigh said she'd been married to Saul Tigh for 7 years in a deleted scene, so we don't consider that strictly canonical. ——Of course the problem is, as Ron has explained in the podcasts, most BSG episodes run long (into the 50 minute range often) and many scenes are simply deleted for time (i.e. the problems that ensued when Apollo/Dualla relationship buildup scenes were cut, usually just for time, from other episodes)--->However, the difference in the Extended Version of (soon to be Hugo Award winning) "Pegasus" is that Ron has openly stated that almost all of this removed material was taken out simply for time issues, not story issues. How should we approach this material? --The Merovingian (C - E) 15:03, 24 July 2006 (CDT)

The issue of "canon" or "non-canon" is one I can seldom speak to -- but I can say that the writers room usually operates as if scenes shot all happened, whether they made the cut or not, unless later developments make better dramatic use of the characters if those scenes didn't occur. There are some scenes that we either redid or deleted because the material wasn't working, but I don't think those have been released -- and those would definitely be "non-canon." In the case of Pegasus, we always assumed the long version happened and we wrote as if you all had seen it, too. - Ngarenn 13:12, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
There is rumor that Ron Moore is even doing a separate, new podcast for the Extended Version of Pegasus, co-hosted with David Eick. Is this just wild rumor?--The Merovingian (C - E) 16:23, 26 July 2006 (CDT)