Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2007: Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
m (Vote people!! :))
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== [[The Twelve Colonies (RDM)]] ==
Debate for '''November 2007'''


I'd like to nominate this again, as it came very close last month.
==[[CIC]]==


*{{support}} Already a quality article. I think only some minor refinements are necessary to bring it to featured status, but if someone objects there can always be other nominees. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:56, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
* {{support}} This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
*{{comment}} I like it, but I'm gonna wait on other nominations before voting. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 16:26, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
* {{support}} I rather like this article myself. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 18:05, 11 November 2007 (CST)
*{{support}} Great overview article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 22:43, 4 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{support}} A very well-sourced article of high encyclopedic quality. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:00, 12 November 2007 (CST)
*{{comment}}: I also like this one. -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 12:02, 5 August 2007 (CDT)
*{{Support}} -- [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 21:28, 6 August 2007 (CDT)


== [[Arts and Literature of the Twelve Colonies]]==
==[[Weapons in the Re-imagined Series]]==
* {{comment}}: It's got a good beat. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:54, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
* {{comment}} Lots of details and pictures. Should also be up to standards regarding standardization, references, etc. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:12, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
* {{support}}: Good beat, indeed. -- [[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 12:01, 5 August 2007 (CDT)
 
==[[Virtual beings]]==
* {{comment}}: I'd likely vote for the Colonies parent, but I thought this was worthy of a shoutout. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:54, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
* {{comment}}: This one's great too. I'm kind torn between it and Twelve Colonies now... --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:56, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
* {{Support}} Good article, and it would be nice to give it some more exposure. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 12:09, 9 June 2007 (CDT)
**{{comment}} With over 16.000 page views it's actually relatively popular. The Twelve Colonies article is the 6th most popular article though. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:59, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
* {{Support}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:17, 7 August 2007 (CDT)
 
==[[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)]]==
* {{comment}} This is a well-sourced article now, although the article could stand to get some additional fresh pictures. Not as much of a portal page as [[Cylons (RDM)]] is, in contrast. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:05, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 17:51, 17 November 2007

Debate for November 2007

CIC

  • Support This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --Spencerian 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support I rather like this article myself. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 18:05, 11 November 2007 (CST)
  • Support A very well-sourced article of high encyclopedic quality. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:00, 12 November 2007 (CST)

Weapons in the Re-imagined Series

  • Comment Lots of details and pictures. Should also be up to standards regarding standardization, references, etc. --Serenity 18:12, 27 October 2007 (CDT)