Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2007: Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Debate for '''September'''
Debate for '''November 2007'''


== [[Virtual beings]] ==
==[[CIC]]==


*{{comment}} Already got nominated last time. Really nice articles, that's well developed. Maybe needs to be combed over for small errors, but that should be it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 07:52, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{support}} This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
* {{support}} I rather like this article myself. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 18:05, 11 November 2007 (CST)
* {{support}} A very well-sourced article of high encyclopedic quality. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:00, 12 November 2007 (CST)


== [[Pegasus (RDM)]] ==
==[[Weapons in the Re-imagined Series]]==
 
* {{comment}} Lots of details and pictures. Should also be up to standards regarding standardization, references, etc. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:12, 27 October 2007 (CDT)
* {{comment}} A very good article that would need to be combed over for small errors, like [[Virtual beings]]. And with all the attention around "[[Razor]]", it would be nice to tie this in with that. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 09:27, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{comment}} Should have some interior pictures of the CIC and Cain's office/quarters, but otherwise good. Though I'd wait for the inevitable Razor update before voting for this. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:38, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
 
== [[Crossroads, Part II]] ==
 
* {{comment}} A very well written episode guide, IMHO, on a very pivotal episode for the series. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 09:27, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{oppose}} In principle very good, but too long for my taste. All the items in the long questions and statements sections have their place, but it just feels a bit too big for me. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:38, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{Oppose}} While not prohibited from being nominated, it seems that episode guides, which includes contributor's not-always-impartial analysis and questions, makes for poor choices for featured articles (although they can be quality articles). --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:37, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
 
== [[Case Orange]] ==
 
* {{comment}} Damn cool article, very detailed for something that had brief screen time, but a nice history behind it paralleling itself with our world. Very emblematic of the attention put into the series. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 09:27, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{comment}} This a good article and could possibly get my vote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:38, 14 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{Support}} It's my very first article. ''My baby'' has grown up so well and has college plans in the fall. (*snif*) --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 00:34, 15 August 2007 (CDT)
* {{Support}} Very nice. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 07:22, 15 August 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 17:51, 17 November 2007

Debate for November 2007

CIC

  • Support This article is filled with the juicy bits that make reading Battlestar Wiki a joy. The layout, the detail, the references, all good. --Spencerian 22:04, 16 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support I rather like this article myself. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 18:05, 11 November 2007 (CST)
  • Support A very well-sourced article of high encyclopedic quality. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:00, 12 November 2007 (CST)

Weapons in the Re-imagined Series

  • Comment Lots of details and pictures. Should also be up to standards regarding standardization, references, etc. --Serenity 18:12, 27 October 2007 (CDT)