Battlestar Wiki talk:Episode Standardization: Difference between revisions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (→Archetype Candidates: switched candidate based on below... anyone can feel free to add/modify/remove to this list and discuss) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (→Archetype Candidates: + note) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Archetype Candidates == | == Archetype Candidates == | ||
# [[Pegasus (episode)]] | # [[Pegasus (episode)]] | ||
'''Note:''' Feel free to add candidates and discuss. | |||
Based on his edits [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Episode Standardization|here]], I believe Merv was proposing "Colonial Day" as a potential archetype candidate.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:21, 24 July 2006 (CDT) | Based on his edits [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Episode Standardization|here]], I believe Merv was proposing "Colonial Day" as a potential archetype candidate.--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:21, 24 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:17, 24 July 2006
Shane, as was my understanding there wasn't a call for making a new standardization project, so much as a call to reinforce our old ones. --The Merovingian (C - E) 17:03, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Episode Standardization well 8 support votes including 6 admins... --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 17:32, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Yeah I supported that but isn't that a drive for enforcing old rules, not a new project? Or, well I guess the Citation Jihad is like that actually; enforcing the existing rules...--The Merovingian (C - E) 17:42, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Would it be better and less confusing to rename this page 'Episode Standardization' to match the project agreed on? I wish that I had originally came up with a better project name. --FrankieG 18:49, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Yeah, that's good; making stuff standardized to S&C --The Merovingian (C - E) 18:52, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Would it be better and less confusing to rename this page 'Episode Standardization' to match the project agreed on? I wish that I had originally came up with a better project name. --FrankieG 18:49, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
- Yeah I supported that but isn't that a drive for enforcing old rules, not a new project? Or, well I guess the Citation Jihad is like that actually; enforcing the existing rules...--The Merovingian (C - E) 17:42, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
I'm sorry, I was really fuzzy when I wrote that first thing and I don't know why I didn't understand it. Of course: when a "Think Tank" proposal goes through and passes, of course it becomes a "project". Sorry about that fuzziness; beer is a wonderful and mysterious thing. --The Merovingian (C - E) 21:10, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
Initial Project Groundwork
I laid down some initial groundwork for the project page (rather unilaterally, but in keeping with the spirit of the TANK proposal). Feel free to modify as needed. --Steelviper 08:21, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
Archetype Candidates
Note: Feel free to add candidates and discuss.
Based on his edits here, I believe Merv was proposing "Colonial Day" as a potential archetype candidate.--Steelviper 08:21, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
- Well, yes and no. Colonial Day is an example of the worst case, episode most needing standardization, which was then "fixed" to a good standard; good "before and after" example is what I mean. However, I think a lot of Season 2 episodes are better "archetypes", off the top of my head I'd say "Pegasus (episode)".--The Merovingian (C - E) 12:01, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
- Deviations from the norm: Season 2 is actually fine, I've looked it over. It's season 1 that had a problem: this guy called "Ernestborg9" made his OWN Reviews on each episode (What exactly "Analysis" was was poorly defined at this early point). Then there's the Miniseries: that's a special case. I'm not sure how to approach that myself, though I think it should be as standard as any article and needs lots of fixes. I'm on to Season One now...--The Merovingian (C - E) 12:04, 24 July 2006 (CDT)