Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Official Representation: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Official Representation
April Arcus (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* {{support}} Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad/Archive02|anonymous sources debate]], and my [[Sources:Correspondence with Jim Iaccino|response]] to it, which itself necesitated an [[Battlestar_Wiki:Wikipedian_Quorum/Archive02#An_apology_regarding_spokesmanship|apology]] to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on [[Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules]], and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | * {{support}} Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad/Archive02|anonymous sources debate]], and my [[Sources:Correspondence with Jim Iaccino|response]] to it, which itself necesitated an [[Battlestar_Wiki:Wikipedian_Quorum/Archive02#An_apology_regarding_spokesmanship|apology]] to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on [[Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules]], and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Indeed. I want to make sure we handle things like that better in the future; it's not like we had a system set up before. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 22:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 03:18, 9 August 2006
- Support - I do not believe that any one person should "represent" BattlestarWiki, unless some sort of near-unanimous vote as Joe indicated directs otherwise, thus I agree strongly with this proposal. --The Merovingian (C - E) 18:44, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support clearly correct --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 21:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the anonymous sources debate, and my response to it, which itself necesitated an apology to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules, and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --Peter Farago 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Indeed. I want to make sure we handle things like that better in the future; it's not like we had a system set up before. --The Merovingian (C - E) 22:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT)