|
|
| (28 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Mini-Series -> Miniseries==
| | :''For previous discussions, [http://en.battlestarwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Miniseries%2C_Night_1&oldid=58598 see this archive.] |
| Ok i've spend a little while changing all references (excluding talk pages) to [[mini-series]] and [[Mini-series]] so link correctly to [[Miniseries]]. However, there is a huge number of articles linking to the [[Mini-Series]] page as you can see [http://www.battlestarwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Mini-Series&limit=250&offset=0 here]. Perhaps some of you lot could help out changing any references you can see to the correct [[Miniseries]]?
| |
| [[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 07:21, 29 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| ::I did some small pages and a few big ones for you.--[[User:Gen00b|Gen00b]] 12:50, 29 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| :::Cheers, I did a load more today too but still a lot to go, over 100 articles left linking to the wrong page --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 10:44, 1 April 2006 (CST)
| |
| ::::They're not ''really'' linking to the wrong page, since mini-series redirects to miniseries. --[[User:Gen00b|Gen00b]] 10:54, 1 April 2006 (CST)
| |
| :::::Well thats them pretty much all gone. A few are still showing up but when looking at the edit code it doesnt appear that there is a reference so i dont know why that is happenening there? --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 04:12, 5 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| == Reason for Expansion == | | ==Major Revision Complete== |
|
| |
|
| The [[Mini-Series#Analysis|analysis]] section needs to be expanded. I began working on it earlier, but never got around to finishing it. Obviously, anyone (including yours truly) can add their thoughts later on. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 17:05, 2 May 2005 (EDT) | | In keeping the miniseries to fit the episode summaries, I have revised this article with the larger details of the episodes, breaking it down by the events from each night as it was aired in the U.S. The analysis has been removed from both, as most of it has been answered or discussed in the series article, [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)]]. Any links to [[Miniseries]] will redirect to [[Miniseries, Night 1]]. The questions section is shortened to the central questions generated by the miniseries only, and minimizes discussion of regular series names and events to keep the article from becoming confusing to new viewers (although most links are updated to their current article). --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:29, 25 October 2006 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| == OK, Now It Needs to be Condensed == | | ==Main Fight== |
|
| |
|
| I've begun the slow process of truncating this page to help in reducing it below the 32K preferred limit as well as to make the page less cumbersome to read. Information or speculation that has been answered ''ad nauseum'' has been removed. Questions that now have answers were updated. Ancillary information available en masse from other articles was trimned and links added. I created a new page for an empty link as well. | | When Helo and Sharon are fleeing from the missles to Caprica, their Dradis pops up with multiple formations of various Cylon and Colonial signals and they say "I think we've found the main fight". Can anyone make out what the markings on the Dradis say? They might show Squadron designations or even ship names. [[User:Commander Mazien|Commander Mazien]] 19:16, 1 December 2006 (CST) |
| | : I'll look into grabbing a cap, if one avails itself to me, though I honestly doubt it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 20:55, 1 December 2006 (CST) |
| | : Update: Unfortunately, all I was able to make out on the DRADIS displays were "Enemy Squadron" and "Viper Squadron". Nothing unique to warrant an article. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 21:11, 1 December 2006 (CST) |
|
| |
|
| I think the two larger sections should be reviewed further and cut down. Likewise, the dialogue and notes may stand a cut as well. [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:32, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)
| | Thanks anyway. [[User:Commander Mazien|Commander Mazien]] 05:46, 2 December 2006 (CST) |
|
| |
|
| :I'm looking into breaking down this page into some logical subarticles today. Main page links should remain fine; this will be the parent page. I want this page to look more like the episode pages in terms of plot summary, and then take the extended analysis and behind-the-scenes information to separate subarticles. More images will help as well, perhaps adding Lowdown information with behind the scenes, a long-asked for article. I will be using elements from other parent-child articles to make this work. We should be generally pleased with the results. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:18, 26 January 2006 (EST)
| | == Cast section == |
|
| |
|
| ::I'm concerned about this. Are you convinced that it's impossible to summarize further? And if we have to split the article, I'd like to point out that Night One/Night Two is the most logical way to do so. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 11:04, 26 January 2006 (EST)
| | Whilst [[Miniseries, Night 2]] has a [[Miniseries, Night 2#Cast|cast section]], where's this article's? [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 11:51, 13 October 2007 (CDT) |
| | :The Miniseries is really one three-hour show, even if you can clearly tell the break point. Two cast sections would be unnecessary duplication. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 11:57, 13 October 2007 (CDT) |
|
| |
|
| :::You're right; breaking it into part one and part two would be most logical. I'd rather see the behind-the-scenes, Lowdown or interview/commentary to the [[Battlestar Galactica (RDM)]] article, which would also reduce the clutter here and limit the analysis to the Night One/Two events and not the series birth, TOS comparisons, or background as a whole. There's also some insight from [[The Official Companion]] that can go there. I'll look at the pages and note my proposed adjustments before I dive in to ensure we're on the same page, so to speak. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:47, 26 January 2006 (EST)
| | == Theatrical Version == |
| | I DVR'ed the HD version of the Miniseries on UniversalHD back in July and just recently watched it (my life as been crazy). It is introduced as the "theatrical version" with a TV-14 rating. I didn't really see any difference with it than the DVD version. Did anyone else view this version? --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 13:04, 12 December 2007 (CST) |
|
| |
|
| == Cylon == | | == "Night"? == |
|
| |
|
| I thought that the original Cylon Centurion was in the museum, not a cylon basestar. --[[User:Blacklight|Blacklight]] | | Is "Night" supposed to be the miniseries title? Where does it say so? I haven't been able to corroborate this.--[[User:Dvd-junkie|Dvd-junkie]] 12:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| :They both are. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:15, 1 October 2005 (EDT) | | : My response is [[Talk:Miniseries,_Night_2#.22Night.22.3F|here]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 13:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC) |
| | |
| ::Alright, I'll make the neccessary changes in the nod section then --[[User:Blacklight|Blacklight]]
| |
| | |
| == Structural Consequences ==
| |
| | |
| "That nuclear hit will come back to haunt them later; there will be consequences to what happened to the ship structurally when it took that hit"
| |
| | |
| :Are they referring to the episode [[Water]] or some other consequence not yet realized? [[User:Rocky8311|Rocky8311]] 02:08, October 19, 2005 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ::Water, almost certainly. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:17, 19 October 2005 (EDT)
| |
| | |
| ::I disagree in part. The water storage was above the flight pods, and Boomer's charges were planted from within, where an explosion would do the most damage since the water would magnify the shockwave. The show has not yet dealt with the fate of the starboard flight pod, which was converted into the museum but is not depressurized. Perhaps with the resources of Pegasus, Galactica will manage to reactivate the starboard flight pod--and maybe not a moment too soon if problems are still occurring from the hit on the port pod. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:02, 2 December 2005 (EST)
| |
| | |
| ==Move==
| |
| Can we ''please'' move this to Miniseries or Mini-series? The intercaps are driving me insane. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:47, 14 December 2005 (EST)
| |
| | |
| : I concur. The [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/mini/updates/ SciFi Website] uses it as if it were not even a proper noun: "''Battlestar Galactica'' miniseries scheduled to air..." I think, at the least, we should move it to "Miniseries". Maybe, though, we should move it to "Miniseries (RDM)" or "Miniseries (2003-2004)". I realize there's no conflict, but there is for the seasons (which might should be "Season 1 (RDM)", etc.) and I like consistency. --[[User:Day|Day]] 01:56, 17 December 2005 (EST)
| |
| | |
| ::No need for (RDM), I think. "Season 1" doesn't even need it, since a TOS Season one article would be entirely redundant with the main TOS article anyway. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:05, 17 December 2005 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == "Episode" Data Template for this Article? ==
| |
| | |
| The miniseries doesn't quite fit with the elements of the new episode template, but it certainly could use it to condense all the statistics as well as make this page look like the deservedly important page that it is--in effect, "episode 0." Can we rig a unique episode table just for this article (and maybe, the TOS opener as well) to condense the data here to fit the format of the series episodes? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 16:49, 9 January 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| :Must... apply... template. Wow. The guest stars alone would crush the normal template. The TOS "episode 0" (Saga of a Star World) fit fine into that box, but it had a very small guest star list, and fit in many other ways more neatly into the "episode" box. I guess if you left off the guest stars, the other mini-series data elements would line up ok with the template. The question would remain (as it does with Saga of a Star World) what you would put on the "previous" line. I put "None" for TOS, but it could theoretically point to the series home (but that seemed redundant with the "episode of" at the top of the template. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 16:59, 9 January 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| ::A quick "demo" (preview might be more precise) looked pretty good. Thanks to the gigantic TOC, the template doesn't have much of an impact on the layout, and some of the clutter at the bottom gets cleaned up. My demo lacked the Guest Stars, though (as I figured it would be overwhelming). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 17:11, 9 January 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| The one-off episode data table that Undc23 implemented looks pretty sweet. My only thought would be that any information contained in the episode data up top need not be retained in the stats section down below. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:39, 26 January 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| == God vs. Gods ==
| |
| | |
| I think it should be added to the "Bloopers" section that the whole Cylon "God" Vs. the Colonial "Gods" concept really hadn't been fleshed out during the miniseries, and possibly not thought up yet. No one says lines like "oh my Gods!", Adama, in his retirement speech said that in creating the Cylons they "Tried to play God" (as opposed to playing "Gods"), and when the Cylon at Ragnar Anchorage says "maybe God decided he made a mistake", Adama makes no effort to correct him (at least about their being only one God). To be fair, Starbuck does pray to the Lords of Kobal when she thinks Apollo is dead, but at best the usage is inconsistent throughout the miniseries, especially considering the big deal it is during the rest of the series. [[User:Ghost|Ghost]] 00:44, 17 February 2006 (EST)
| |
| | |
| :No. This extended into the regular series; you see, as polytheists, they could just be referring to a specific God of their choice when they swear using the sinugular "God", and as for "God" making a mistake, they kind of could view it as Zeus, etc. Point is, they as polytheists can get away with using the singular; the goof would be if the Cylons used the plural. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 04:25, 17 February 2006 (EST)
| |
| ::Exactly. The ancient Aztecs wouldn't have said "Oh my Gods" if it rained, they would say "Oh my God! / Oh my God of rain! / Oh my Tlaloc!" I mean they probably wouldn't say that at all but you get my point. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] 05:21, 2 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| == Summary ==
| |
| How come there is no episode summary for this episode. I also think that this page would be better if it were split. --[[User:Grafix|Grafix]] 08:12, 8 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| == Reformating this Page ==
| |
| I would like to propose the miniseries article is split into 2 separate pages. The reason for this is that it is getting too long and I got an error message recently telling me this when I tried to edit it.
| |
| | |
| I therefore propose that on page 1 we have what happened in the miniseries and on page 2 comments and analysis.
| |
| | |
| It would look like:
| |
| :Page 1
| |
| ::Overview
| |
| ::Backplot
| |
| ::Summary (at present we don't have one)
| |
| ::Questions
| |
| ::Noteworthy dialogue
| |
| ::Cast
| |
| ::Related Topics
| |
| ::External Links
| |
| :Page 2
| |
| ::Analysis
| |
| ::Notes
| |
| ::Official Statements
| |
| | |
| Please put your comments here. If they are positive I would be happy to do the split. --[[User:Grafix|Grafix]] 01:37, 12 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :Sounds good to me. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] 08:04, 14 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :I wish I'd noticed this last week. Wouldn't the more natural split be between night one and night two? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:14, 23 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| ::This was something I'd hoped to do some weeks ago. "Night One" and "Night Two" would be more appropriate. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:54, 24 March 2006 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :::I thought the Miniseries was a single entity and as such the current layout reflects this. --[[User:Grafix|Grafix]] 02:04, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| ::::If it's a single entity, then it deserves to be on one page. Splitting the content across two pages arbitrarily is atrocious, no matter how big the combined page may be. However, splitting it across nights one and two would be logical and would help with length issues. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:09, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| :::::But the split wasn't abitary - page 1 describes what happened in the episode and page 2 contains notes and analysys. --[[User:Grafix|Grafix]] 03:01, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| == Template ==
| |
| | |
| What was wrong with using the normal episode template? --[[User:Day|Day]] <sup>([[User talk:Day|Talk]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Administrators' noticeboard|Admin]])</sup> 19:19, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :Nothing in my mind. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 19:27, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::The problem I found when trying to get it to work right was the "series" area. Since it was designed for Season X, Episode X of Series. The mini-series does not have a season. So I just subst the code so the whole table can be formated out, but I could edit the sections the miniseries did not need. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 19:31, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::That was a nice catch; the error was more subtle than I'd have guessed missing required fields was. Why didn't you just edit the template to omit the fields if they were blank, though? --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 19:51, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::::Tried a whole bunch of combos. I think I spent a good 15 mintues on it. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:06, 8 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::This is fixable. Shane, please don't flag substantive contributions to talk pages as minor. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:00, 9 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| ==UK Airdate==
| |
| Can someone confirm the airdate and timeslot of the UK premiere? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:08, 16 April 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| == Unsourced: Ammo destroyed in decommissioning ceremony ==
| |
| | |
| Where was that mentioned in the Miniseries? This needs a source. --[[User:Rafale|Rafale]] 05:09, 2 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :They destroyed the ammunition in a deleted scene. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 08:00, 2 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| == Update on HD Captures for Everyone ==
| |
| | |
| The BSG Miniseries was just posted up in 720p format, so i'm frantically downloading it before i have to move out and i lose this lovely 10mbit internet connection - be prepared for some BIIIIIIIIG Screencaps people! --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 22:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | |
| :Great news! --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:52, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::I been around for a while, but what is the 720p format? :) --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 22:53, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| :::720p is an HDTV format. It means 720 vertical lines of resolution, transmitted at 60 full frames a second. 1080i is the other main HDTV format, which means 1080 vertical lines, but only transmitted at 30 full frames a second, or 60 half-frames. The upshot is that although a full 1080 line image can be reconstructed from a 1080i signal, few rippers have bothered to do this, so most of our HDTV captures are only available at a resolution of 540 vertical lines. 720p will be a considerable improvement over this. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:26, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
| ::::Actually the reason for the 960x540 res on the captures i put up - is because the original 4.2 gig MPEG2 is too large to store even on my behemothic rig - so i downsize them to 960x540 700mb XVID. I could put up 1080i full frame captures of some episodes that i have the .TS or MPEG2 backed up on DVD, but they'd look MAHOOSIVE :D --[[User:Fordsierra4x4|Fordsierra4x4]] 18:22, 9 June 2006 (CDT)
| |
