No edit summary |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) (→Usage concern: other votes area) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I can be edited to add the "other" votes also. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 02:38, 19 July 2006 (CDT) | :I can be edited to add the "other" votes also. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 02:38, 19 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I can see what you're saying Joe. Maybe a place explicitely for non-admin votes below the admin ones. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 15:26, 14 December 2006 (CST) | ::I can see what you're saying Joe. Maybe a place explicitely for non-admin votes below the admin ones. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 15:26, 14 December 2006 (CST) | ||
::I think that's what the <your vote here> section was intended for (unless you're in the above list). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:46, 14 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:46, 14 December 2006
Usage concern
I know of the reasons behind such a template/list, but when it was used on the Think Tank proposal pages, I felt that it was an invisible barrier that didn't permit regular users to vote. (Hence my notes on how all users are welcome to vote.) As I believe that everyone should have a say in these Think Tank proposals (and other aspects of the Wiki), I am leery of such a template's use, if not it's existence. At least in its current form. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 02:30, 19 July 2006 (CDT)
- I can be edited to add the "other" votes also. --Shane (T - C - E) 02:38, 19 July 2006 (CDT)
- I can see what you're saying Joe. Maybe a place explicitely for non-admin votes below the admin ones. --Talos 15:26, 14 December 2006 (CST)
- I think that's what the <your vote here> section was intended for (unless you're in the above list). --Steelviper 15:46, 14 December 2006 (CST)