User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.
m (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr./Archive6.)
m (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr./Archive6.)
Line 14: Line 14:
: Answered. :-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 21:18, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
: Answered. :-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 21:18, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
:: New idea! Gtalk :D [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:20, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
:: New idea! Gtalk :D [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 14:20, 18 June 2007 (CDT)
== Deleted redirects ==
I noticed you deleted [[401]] and [[4.01]], while I ''intended'' for [[403]] and [[4.03]] to be deleted. The nastyness here is that when you click the "Article" button on a redirect's talk page, it'll go to the redirect target (rather than the redirect itself). So please delete [[401]] and [[4.01]] and restore [[403]] and [[4.03]]. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 15:49, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
:Where should 403 go then? [[He That Believath in Me]]? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 16:02, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
:Ok, so I've redirected [[403]] and [[4.03]] to He That Believath In Me... The issue is, however, we don't seem to have an official production number for that episode. (From the comments I've read so far, it seems that the Razor is considered a part of Season 4 and may just be episodes "401" and "402". -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 16:08, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
::Yeah, I just noted that on the Razor talk page. The movie is 4.01 and 4.02. But that's production numbers. When people say "first episode of Season 4" they probably mean "He That Believeth In Me". Anyways, this also needs to be corrected in the episode data templates, unless those aren't meant for production numbers. ARG! Confusion --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:11, 11 June 2007 (CDT)
:::Don't the TV magazines list the episode number? If that is the case, we'd better just delete the 4?? and 4.?? redirects and wait until January for HTBIM's episode number. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 06:31, 12 June 2007 (CDT)


== A "Welcome Bot" ==
== A "Welcome Bot" ==

Revision as of 08:01, 23 June 2007


Gtalk for a min

Update. :) Shane (T - C - E) 21:10, 10 June 2007 (CDT)

Answered. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 21:18, 10 June 2007 (CDT)
New idea! Gtalk :D Shane (T - C - E) 14:20, 18 June 2007 (CDT)

A "Welcome Bot"

I was looking around, and I found this: http://botwiki.sno.cc/wiki/Python:Welcome.py Should we create? Shane (T - C - E) 07:08, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

While I'm usually all about saving time, it seems to me that there's some value to a personal greeting. When someone went to thank the bot for their welcome, the feeling of camaraderie may be... reduced. --Steelviper 08:36, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
A welcome bot doesn't seem very useful for me: we usually manage to welcome new users quite fast (sometimes even within 5 minutes of registration). The upside of the welcome bot is that it can automatically block disallowed usernames, which is quite useful. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:55, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
I'm going to echo SV's statement here: I feel that users should be proactive in welcoming users, since it's an "icebreaker" of sorts. Also, we don't have a problem with welcoming users; as Catrope indicated, we welcome users fairly quickly, which is nothing short of awesome, in my book. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 16:13, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
Ditto. I'm happy how the process has matured over the years when I got into the swing of doing them...it's nice and personal, unlike a Cylon. :) --Spencerian 16:35, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
Aye. You mentioned it once... Just wanted you to know :) Shane (T - C - E) 07:22, 14 June 2007 (CDT)

You should..

Restore all your old chats and have the bot archive'em. :D Shane (T - C - E) 21:35, 16 June 2007 (CDT)

Should I do them as subpages or merely copy and paste all of them into my talk page? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 21:41, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
Copy them in order on this page and the bot will do it automatically. Sub-pages would be bad. :) Shane (T - C - E) 21:52, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
That figures. LOL -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 21:54, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
Fire the "laser", Dr. Evil. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 22:01, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
Fire the "laser" is now working on your talk page. Lower case "k" is different from upper-case "K". 6 archives created. :) Shane (T - C - E) 12:33, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
Heh. Go figure. Thanks Shane! -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 22:47, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
The bot author was trying to figure out also why 146 archives were in the queue to be made. It was so crazy, I was going to flip out. lol. But in the end, simple error is to blame. :D Shane (T - C - E) 22:58, 17 June 2007 (CDT)