Information for "Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Links Discretion"
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Links Discretion
Basic information
| Display title | Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Links Discretion |
| Default sort key | Think Tank/Links Discretion |
| Page length (in bytes) | 12,106 |
| Namespace ID | 5 |
| Namespace | Battlestar_Wiki_talk |
| Page ID | 10027 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Shane (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 21:52, 13 July 2006 |
| Latest editor | Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 01:54, 11 April 2020 |
| Total number of edits | 29 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (3) | Templates used on this page: |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I think Merv is in the right direction with this. While it has never been codified anywhere, we are an encyclopedia and episode guide -- and we are not a repository for links. Wikipedia itself has something similar: "Wikipedia is not a repository of links". Furthermore, I wouldn't mind having people scrutinize links for inclusion. For instance, editors will question an edit that is questionable and not sourced correctly, so why should we treat web links any differently? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 21:56, 13 July 2006 (CDT) |