Information for "Talk:Battlestar/Archive 1"

Discussion page of Battlestar/Archive 1

Basic information

Display titleTalk:Battlestar/Archive 1
Default sort keyBattlestar/Archive 1
Page length (in bytes)2,959
Namespace ID1
NamespaceTalk
Page ID1028
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creator64.81.61.9 (talk)
Date of page creation06:43, 19 January 2005
Latest editorJoe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit16:58, 18 March 2010
Total number of edits43
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (2)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
I was working the Disambiguations Pages, and I noticed that there are over 100 Battlestar links that go to the disambig page. I'd estimate over 95 percent of them intend to go to Original battlestar (RDM). Since there's already a disambig line at the top of that article, I propose that we change this page to a redirect to that one (after we redirect any pages that are intended to go to the TOS or video game spots). If there was equal amounts of content being added to all namespaces, I would argue for equality (and the disambig page), but since most of the new content being written will be about RDM (especially with how much progress has been made on the TOS pages) I think the average user would benefit from a redirect. I'll go ahead and try to identify and fix the TOS and video game links, but hold off on a Viper-like disambig purge until it is determined whether or not we'll redirect. --Steelviper 09:40, 18 January 2006 (EST)
Information from Extension:WikiSEO