Welcome to Battlestar Wiki!
Welcome to the Wiki, RMelon. Feel free to tell us about yourself on your user page. Before you get started on other edits, please read the Standards and Conventions, which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in its particular use of verb tense, abbreviations, formatting, and the like). If you need help in learning how to use the MediaWiki tools supported here, you can check out the tutorial and the wiki markup code pages for assistance.
Please read the articles "What is Battlestar Wiki" and "What Battlestar Wiki is Not." This important information details what contributions are acceptable in this encyclopedia.
We encourage you to participate in any projects on Battlestar Wiki, which work to enhance a particular subject or extension of the wiki. These include the Original Series Article Development Project and several language translations of Battlestar Wiki. If you have a new idea for a new project, visit the Think Tank, where we hash out large-scale ideas before implementing them.
Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on an article's talk page that's relevant to the subject, the Wikipedian Quorum or the Administrators' noticeboard. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)!
We look forward to your contributions to the community! --Catrope 12:35, 31 January 2007 (CST)
Recent rollback
Welcome. I rolled back the minor edit in Eye of Jupiter. We don't know of any chronological association between the various Cylon models; the numbers themselves don't tell the whole story. To viewers, the final five are the last five revealed, but to the Cylons, they are simply missing. It could be the first five made, or the last five made, or something in between. For now, "lost" is preferable to "last" for the purposes of that article. --Spencerian 08:57, 1 February 2007 (CST)
- Understandable, but they're not really "lost," we just don't know who they are. If anyone sees this, what do you think about using a different word, like "unknown?" RMelon 10:08, 1 February 2007 (CST)
- That's good, too, I think. --Spencerian 11:03, 1 February 2007 (CST)